An unexpected crisis challenges authorities in many ways. Preparedness and active action in different roles help to overcome disasters, says Anne Quarshie, Post-doctoral Researcher at the LUT School of Business and Management.
Extensive disasters test authorities’ ability to steer the activities of different organisations. Unexpected natural disasters and other sudden crises often demand efficient interaction with little time to prepare.
”The Hurricane Sandy rescue operation proved that it is important for authorities to operate actively in many roles. In addition to their conventional practices, authorities supported businesses and supply chains in staying operational, and they did this more successfully than during Hurricane Katrina,” explains Anne Quarshie, Post-doctoral Researcher at the LUT School of Business and Management.
Quarshie studied the roles that New Jersey state government agencies took and the practices they employed in the disaster response efforts in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy, which struck the United States in 2012. For her interview and field study, Quarshie interviewed altogether 29 people from 18 organisations, including state government agencies, leading disaster relief organisations, and private sector actors.
Only few similar qualitative studies have been carried out on humanitarian networks.
During disasters, authorities take on three main roles: organiser, facilitator, and supply network member. The study identifies 16 practices employed by the government in these roles.
In the role of organiser, authorities aim to steer and influence how various types of organisations respond to the disaster.
”For example, they brought together not only key public actors but also representatives of industry associations and non-profit organisations for the operation. This helped to keep all critical actors up to date on developments and to coordinate activities efficiently,” Quarshie relates.
In addition to commanding public actors, the government tried to orchestrate the efforts of non-profit organizations together with a local non-profit coalition.
As facilitators, government agencies transmitted information, provided training and coordinated interaction among different actors, for example. As supply network members, the government agencies aimed to secure the continuity of their own supply chains and those of critical private and non-profit actors.
”When the hurricane hit New Jersey, power outages lasted for up to two weeks, the infrastructure broke down, and shortages of basic commodities complicated efforts. The authorities did their best to enable critical actors to purchase supplies and delivery trucks to reach their destinations.”
Quarshie’s research results may be helpful in preparing for disasters in various contexts. At the moment, the coronavirus is challenging the response capacity of authorities globally. Moreover, climate change increases the risk of extreme weather events everywhere.
Authorities could, for example, pay attention to the following in their interorganisational disaster response efforts:
Anne Quarshie is a postdoctoral researcher at the LUT School of Business and Management. The article ”Interorganizational interaction in disaster response networks: A government perspective” by Quarshie and Rudolf Leuschner is forthcoming in the Journal of Supply Chain Management and available open access at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jscm.12225
Anne Quarshie, Postdoctoral Researcher, LUT School of Business and Management
tel. +358 50 433 2514, anne.quarshie(a)lut.fi
Clean energy, water and air, sustainable business and entrepreneurship are the key challenges to which LUT University seeks solutions through technology and business expertise. Our campuses are located in Lappeenranta and Lahti.
© Koodiviidakko Oy - Y-tunnus 1939962-1